Monday, September 21, 2009

Seventh Letter to Mr. Obama on September 17, 2009

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Phone: 202-456-1414


Dear Mr. Obama,

Breaking the Law, Breaching of Ethics and Violation of Science

Mr. Obama, this is the seventh registered letter sending to you in almost a year and so far I got no response. It is not a surprise because also during my PhD in the US I sent five letters to my workmates and bosses at Embrapa in Brazil requesting rainfall data of Amazon region for my dissertation and I got no reply. So, I bargained rainfall data in the US putting together a database enough to accomplish my dissertation in 3.5 years with honors despite denied support from my own institution. I am deeply aware on occasional negligence and careless in the public system but science is very strong and nature is consistent because the gravity that affects you there in the White House is the same that affects me here in the opposed hemisphere.

I sent already around 5,000 letters to Inventors, Attorney, Examiners requesting lawfully Information Disclosure Statements regarding my ‘scientific discovery’ in Hydrology. Sadly many of them are assuming that any invention can be reinvented, common knowledge on textbooks can be ignored, and the rules of the Law can be distorted.

Sometimes negligence in the public system is a shame to their citizens. In California Jaycee Lee Dugard at 11 years old was kidnapped and then raped during 18 years by Phillip Garrido a rapist in the federal registry bearing anklet with GPS who was able to raise kids in his backyard, even 911 calls raising flags did not end this ordeal. The dark side is that Ms. Duggard was able to raise two girls 11 and 15 in her secluded backyard protecting them from alcohol, drugs, and obesity. Around 4 million American obese kids are not in better shape because the distortion of values combined to public negligence harms their health by adopting poor lifestyles from a free society.

There is another public embarrassment regarding Mr. Bernard L. Madoff during 16 years cheating SEC and stealing around $65 billion fraud in the largest Ponzi scheme reaping from serious people and institutions that blindly were trusting government supervision ignoring many raised red flags.

The consequences of public mismanagement deeply can damage trust on functioning of society by lack of leadership.

How long will it take for you to protect Hydrology from being raped by lay people from other sciences? I am neither an innocent 11 years old girl nor a greed financial investor but a scientist that understands that nature cannot be deceived.

Let us be honest. This team of scientists below is basically Chemical/Electronic/Electrical Engineers working with capillary and liquid. How much Hydrology background can be found in their professional education? Probably none, but what about Ethics and respecting the Laws regarding my request? Why not refer my patent in the list as lawfully requested so the Examiner could protect my issued claims accordingly honoring Patent Laws? They even do not know that liquid move by a Hydraulic Gradient and the flow is addressed by Saturated or Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity. What about fluid matric potential, water table, pores connectivity, anisotropic flow, saturated and unsaturated hydraulic zone, etc.? They are just laypeople trying to make inroads in a field they have no expertise taking advantage of USPTO negligence toward Hydrology science.

At Pennsylvania State University on May 10, 1996 on my PhD commencement President Bill Clinton said that we were honored of receiving the highest education that the United States could offer to their citizens and that society would be proud of us in the future for creating new jobs never imagined before.

He mentioned nothing about USPTO being biased harming Hydrology allowing my ‘scientific discovery’ be violated shamefully by lazy patents from lay people that even do not work and deeply ignore common knowledge from my PhD textbooks.

He did not mention about American institutions sponsoring scientists that break the Law, breach Ethics and Violate Science ignoring common knowledge long standing on scientific literature.

There is another team of scientists at PARC trying to work with liquid ignoring hydrology and the same macro geometry of my issued patent US 6,766,817 filed on July 25, 2001 and issued on July 27, 2004.

Even worse, the inventors and attorney ignored my Lawful requests of IDS (§ 1.56 Duty to disclose information material to patentability) sent on November 24, 2008.

Thomas Hantschel

3485 Alameda de las Pulgas #¨6

Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA

David K. Fork

1993 Farndon Avenue

Los Altos, CA 94024 USA

US 20090233815 - September 17, 2009

Eugene M. Chow

324 Aldean Avenue

Mountain View, CA 94043 USA

Dirk De Bruyker

535 Everett Avenue #615

Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA

Michel A Rosa

41 Sunny Ave.

Wavell Heights

Brisbane, Qld 4012 AU



2099 Gateway Place

Suite 320

San Jose CA 95110 USA

Patrick Bever

Reg. No. 33,834

Phone: 408-451-5902


1 7,569,905 Systems and methods for electrical contacts to arrays of vertically aligned nanorods

2 7,356,920 Micro-machined structure production using encapsulation

3 7,241,420 Capillary-channel probes for liquid pickup, transportation and dispense using stressy metal

4 7,202,173 Systems and methods for electrical contacts to arrays of vertically aligned nanorods

From this continuous raping of Hydrology I believe even more that my ‘scientific discovery’ (above) as a breakthrough making near 50 thousand patents obsolete for ignoring Hydrology and opening rooms for another new 200 thousand patents combining Hydrology and Energy Cycle on mass transfer.

I learned deeply during my PhD in the US that when people break the Law they get the consequences. So, I have already included one more demand to the President of the United States of America regarding the Law Enforcement. Since 2006 in written communication I have been demanding USPTO to stop a massive infringement on my issued patent rights suggesting the following below

Mr. President I suggest USPTO the following:

  1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;
  2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;
  3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.
  4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.
  5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).
  6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).
  7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

Mr. Obama, as a baby you learned about the importance of respecting gravity to walk and what happens when you misstep failing to nature principles.

I am worried that Americans are becoming obese, now broken, ignoring science and even trying to overstep the rules of the Law. My ‘scientific discovery’ can provide thousands of jobs if respected accordingly.

I believe that it does not require a strong intellectual power to understand that Hydrology is supposed to be handled by Hydrologists, as well as Laws are handled by Lawyers, Chemistry by Chemists, and so on.

By the way, Hydrology is not a new science. Henry Darcy proposed a Law about Saturated Flow in 1856 to address Hydraulic Conductivity on porosity. Edgard Buckingham proposed an updating equation to measure Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow in 1906 and my issued patent US 6,766,817 is the first one to measure it on artificial porosity near a century later deploying classical hydrogeology to the patenting system.

By the way, wick/wicking is the kite of aerodynamics marring today 24,648 issued patents by skirting common knowledge in classical Hydrology showing how long a Classical Science can be raped by negligent public servers.

USPTO bias ignoring Hydrology is a negligence lasting near a century that is going to be over soon simply because common knowledge cannot be ignored and wise people know about simple rules.

Honesty and commonality is the best analytical tool to make inroads to nature meanderings. Some lay inventors propelled by ignorance think that flying a kite can lead them toward airplanes by skirting aerodynamics.

Nature blesses you and the United States of America.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, September 18, 2009

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265


( (

( (

No comments:

Post a Comment