Thursday, November 11, 2010

Fifteenth Letter to Mr. Obama on November 11, 2010

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Obama,

Official Cheating of Hydrology Science - DISHONESTY

Why to have a patenting system if an invention can be poorly reinvented by lay people with huge pockets overstepping the boundaries of the Law?

Why to allow advanced Hydrology science be violated by lay people with no background in the art crushing a classical science important to society like it could have curbed the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in the early beginning?

Sorry, ignorance is not an excuse!

You are a Lawyer from Harvard and are also the President of the USA.

Mr. Obama, so far this is my 15th letter sent you on the subject, also I sent 31 letters to Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., 17 letters to the Patenting Firm Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP, and dozens to USPTO.

As total I sent 4,521 letters and many more will come till the US learn the importance of being honest and respect Hydrology Science, one of the oldest to human knowledge. I like sending my letters to Penn State, Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Princeton, etc. to let academics understand how much of their textbooks are neglected in Washington, DC. by the US government.

During my PhD at Penn State University around 1994 I was used to make some jokes as peers were masturbating and selling their sperm to fertility clinics letting females to order their DNA counterparts for procreation from a catalog. This was too weird to my background as a farmer boy pursuing to be a scientist one day:

‘No, in Brazil we are so behind in the developmental chain that we still have to make our babies at home by the old dirty traditional way. In my country we still have to chase the girls convincing them that we are the dreamed studs to plow their fertile lands with our sharpen hoes and sow our seeds as a regular routine of a hard working duty’. To the Europeans I was just saying ‘Brazilians are so deprived of memory and intelligence that this is the reasoning for having sex everyday on many approaches because soon we forget and we have to do all over again many times in order to keep safe our archaic procreation resources. But, you Europeans are so advanced, superior, and intelligent that you can have sex intercourse just yearly or once in a life time enough to fulfill your procreation duties.’ If humans could count on wisdom of the American x European combination sex and procreation endeavors would ‘regress’ to a simple routine of searching, uploading and downloading DNA archives by internet!

Ironically I have to feel so proud of being just an underdeveloped human!

As time gone by we now know that many of those sperm sellers were just losers in need of cash sometimes cheating on their profiles and even bearing genetic flaws. Now we face this fertility conundrum about human intelligence be used to spread stupidity broader in our genetic pool – welcome to new edges of modern life and persistent failing leadership!

Fifteen years later the world is learning that developed people are just irresponsible even to run the economy, are getting obese, and becoming very dishonest harming science and respect, collapsing faster by their own misdeeds and driving the world to a gloomy bankruptcy threatening human existence and a subtle balance with nature.

Mr. President, It is not a surprise that your government is losing ground from Americans as support is decreasing to 37% making your party weaker as you fail on your duties. In two years if you do not change track it is very unlikely to be reelected due to continuous critical mistakes on your leadership bringing lots of uncertainty to your own people.

The economy cannot be fixed because the system was deceitfully designed to allow common laws of offer/demand succumb to greed/fears as the trust to Americans worldwide is fading away. American companies were profiting up to 30% from the stock exchange speculation instead of production and it seems that investors around the world are weary to invest back in stock since American HONESTY is vanishing as well as huge chunk of money disappeared in the last economic crisis.

It is amazing that you set the FBI to expel for life a drunken teen Luke Angel 17 cursing you by email. But, 14 letters I sent as a PhD scientist requesting respect to science and to my IP rights at USPTO were neglected. One of my letters was even providing scientific insights on ignored Hydrology to curb the oil spill in the early beginning preventing the worst oil spill in the US history. The consequences of ignoring Hydrology are having its toll. Mr. Barack Obama, sincerely I think that you should resign as an American President due to your continuous failure as a leader of a nation that needs wise decision making reaching safer grounds. Why to wait two years and let the situation deteriorate even more? I assure you that your reputation is not protected by fussing with intoxicated brats.

Mr. President, I got PhD at Penn State Univ. in 3.5 years while Americans take 7 years and half quit on their way. Bill Clinton the speecher of my commencement was there on reelection campaign pretending that US government is serious and honest. I had to let my Brazilian institution fire me besides bumping to a ‘scientific breakthrough’ as I was aware on Brazilian public institutions incompetence to let me pursue important endeavors. During twelve years without salary I had to do my science by myself and also raise a family of 3 kids. I had to carry out more than 3 thousand experiments to be sure that my new conceptions in hydrodynamics comply with nature functioning. I was able to open a company in the US and had two American Patent Attorneys helping me to have my first patents issued. Now my IP rights are being violated by lay people in Hydrology Science having US government negligence and/or collusion overstepping the boundaries of my sound science. I do not think so as I understand the underlying malfunctioning of society.

I already sent a letter to Ms. Dilma Rousseff the Brazilian elected president. Mr. Obama, your mother was obese and got cancer like Ms. Rousseff and also my wife which is not overweight. I already told Mr. Rousseff to get fit since obesity can increase 38% chances of cancer and obesity led by Americans are plaguing the world. Ms. Rousseff seems to be a bold lady that already faced jail term fighting against dictatorship and may have a different understanding on honesty and good deeds toward governing and leadership. She knows how ugly a bad government can derail and the consequences people may suffer.

Ms. Rousseff felt on her skin the weight of corruption on government reputation since she was going to win the election in the first round but association to bribery by her substitute Elenice Guerra Chief of Staff Minister forced a runoff. Brazilian people are becoming weary about continuous corruption scandals that need some fix to have a more efficient and competent government to lead Brazil to a promising future. ENEM failure last week showed the hardship she is tackling and the importance of picking competent servants.

From one side I am glad with US pat. 7,819,822 issued to Roche Diagnostics on Oct 26, 2010 because it proves that my ‘scientific breakthrough’ works as I designed it getting some hints from nature on developing perforations on Phloem and Xylem around 400 millions of years ago. I called it Tubarc as Tube + Arc and it was issued on Jul 27, 2004 with filing date going back to Jul 24, 2001. I claimed it as a better geometry to replace capillarity and to fulfill a scientific gap still open according to the scientific literature since the fluid moves under suction in the round geometry.

US pat. 6,766,817 p 2 line 60:

‘Specialized scientific literature about unsaturated zones also recognizes this shortcoming. For example: "Several differences and complications must be considered. One complication is that concepts of unsaturated flow are not as fully developed as those for saturated flow, nor are they as easily applied." (See Dominico & Schwartz, 1990. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. Pg. 88. Wiley). Concepts of unsaturated flow have not been fully developed to date, because the "capillary action" utilized to measure the adhesion-cohesion force of porosity is restrained by capillary tube geometry conceptions. The term "capillary action" has been wrongly utilized in the art as a synonym for unsaturated flow, which results in an insinuation that the tube geometry conception captures this phenomenon when in truth it does not. ‘

I even provided some teaching to let lay people improve their bare Hydrological background:

US pat. 6,766,817 p 1 line 65:

‘A fluid that possesses a positive pressure can be generally defined in the field of hydrology as saturated fluid. Likewise, a fluid that has a negative pressure (i.e., or suction) can be generally defined as an unsaturated fluid. Fluid matric potential can be negative or positive. For example, water standing freely at an open lake, can be said to stand under a gravity pull. The top surface of the liquid of such water accounts for zero pressure known as the water table or hydraulic head. Below the water table, the water matric potential (pressure) is generally positive because the weight of the water increases according to parameters of force per unit of area. When water rises through a capillary tube or any other porosity, the water matric potential (e.g., conventionally negative pressure or suction) is negative because the solid phase attracts the water upward relieving part of its gravitational pull to the bearing weight. The suction power comes from the amount of attraction in the solid phase per unit of volume in the porosity. ‘

What is going on at USPTO? Bribery, Corruption, and/or Collusion ? ? ?

Mr. Max Hindenburg the Primary Patent Examiner issuing US pat. 7,819,822 allowed my invention be reinvented again totally ignoring my patent not even citing it as he was aware of it citing my patent on May 7, 2008 issuing 7,377,904. There is another aggravation since I sent many letters to Roche Diagnostics about my ‘scientific breakthrough’ and for good faith the company was supposed to have asked IDS (Information Disclosure Statement).

There is an ugly side of Roche endeavors as it can be figured out at the picture on the right regarding the appropriate geometry from the patent application 20070197937 on August 23, 2007. They had no Hydrology background to handle the issue as they learned with my issued patent, got the appropriate functioning and got a Patent Law company breaking the Law claiming again my invention since I have been notifying all involved parties on many instances.

This figure on the right has something very funny and enlightening:

So far the three inventors had no hydrodynamic input on the importance of a perfect geometry for fluid conduction. On grabbing the appropriate geometry from Tubarc US pat. 6,766,817 a fair and legal ‘scientific discovery’ in order to soften the beat the team increased to 13 inventors to spread the personal burden of overstepping with US pat. 7,819,822 supported by Roche economic resources and USPTO negligence and/or connivance:

US pat. 7,819,822, Body fluid sampling device by Calasso; Irio Guiseppe (Arth, CH), Griss; Patrick (Zurich, CH), Sarofim; Emad (Hagendorn, CH), Jaeggi; Rainer (Wohlen, CH), Kraemer; Uwe(Ilvesheim, DE), Hasker; Dave (San Jose, CA), Zimmer; Volker (Laumersheim, DE), Schmid; Wilfried (Mannheim, DE), Fuerst; Otto (Viernheim, DE), List; Hans (Hessenneck-Kailbach, DE), Haar; Hans-Peter (Wiesloch, DE), Arnitz; Theo (Waghaeusel, DE), Roe; Steven N. (San Mateo, CA)., Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN), October 26, 2010

Simply they have no handle on the Hydrodynamic properties to address the core issue. They never gauged Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity, have no idea about Hydraulic Zones, anisotropic unsaturated flow, vertical hydraulic gradient potential, molecular connectivity, self-sustaining reversible flow, molecular drainage, void ratio, pore connectivity, porosity geometry self-cleaning filtering, inertial/rotating energy addiction/subtraction, etc.

Mr. Obama, nobody can argue any ignorance on such issue as so far I sent 4,521 letters to people in the US requesting them to respect my IP rights and my ‘scientific discovery’. Only to the Patenting Firm Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP behind this shameful violation I sent 17 letters. Also I sent 31 letters to Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc.

Can anybody argue that they were not aware about the standing claims of my ‘scientific discovery’ US pat. 6,766,817 and my valid and legal IP rights ? ? ? ?

Is Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN) bribing USPTO and the law firm involved to circumvent my invention and not collect royalties ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Since 2006 in written communication I have been demanding USPTO to stop a massive infringement on my issued patent rights suggesting the following below to USPTO:

1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;

2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;

3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.

4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.

5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).

6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).

7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

Why is the soap bubble round?

Just because it is the most efficient geometry for the distribution of forces in nature which is so coherent on the principles.

Then it comes the ugly side of US pat. 7,819,822 because it is so poorly written on hydrological issues. This is natural as Roche Diagnostics does not hire Hydrologists/Soil Physicists to digest the technicalities of fluids moving on porous systems. They grabbed my geometry but did not elaborate on the principles and spatial dynamics involved in it.

The underlying reasons of such blatant violation of my issued patents is a clear misunderstanding that money buys off everything including Patent Examiners, Patent Lawyers, and government employees overstepping science, ethics, and Honesty. I think that it is time to set boundaries and make examples if you intend to protect a safer future.

They are not that smart since a ‘scientific discovery’ is so powerful on its principles standing any form of distortion or manipulation. Nature cannot be deceived and wise people were supposed to be aware of it. Just imagine shrewd guys trying to circumvent Antoine Lavoisier, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, etc.

Why football was invented in England and Brazil is the land of football holding five worldcups titles while England holds just one?

The simplest explanation is that this human activity is not dependent on a patenting system, neither education, nor government seriousness. It just requires raw talent and flair to defeat the opponent hitting the net on a style that our people are teaching the world how to do it with elegance and beauty. The next worldcup is being held on my neighborhood and I am going to enjoy as I wish science were a human activity also unbiased as football. Unhappily Samba and Carnival matches the same reasoning.

Pelé is a black man king of football that won three times worldcups. The first time he was just seventeen and we are so proud of having many black people outstanding here doing good deeds to humankind. Machado de Assis was a black man born in 1839 that became a famous Brazilian writer molding our culture. You are near to become the worst black American president if you do not mend yourself as a clear feedback from your misdeed is popping up to soil your reputation.

I never cared about fame or wealth but having a regular life and doing something good. My name was not assigned to anything in my science as it is just a word my father picked and I happen to be just another one mingling with so many commoners around. There is no doubt that my science will prevail as it is blessed by nature and I just do my best to make it happen during my lifetime.

It seems that your power as American President is more to destroy yourself and compromise the future of a misguiding nation. My ‘scientific discoverycan stand by its own strengthen as you are collapsing by your own mistakes and missing a chance of delivering what is expected. The clock is ticking and in two years on reelection you will understand the consequences of your misguidance. My regret is that that oil spill could have been prevented by my science Hydrology avoiding harm to nature and human affairs. Bad people violating my discovery do not want Hydrology to serve better society, and they are so wrong, and they will understand it!

As a scientist I like a simple belief that God = Nature advising us to pursue a balance in life. But nature writes no books, demands no war, and promises no lands, even less joy afterlife. I belief that any form of government should work for its people when honesty prevails. When you misstep falling down you know that nature is in charge and a fast punishment occurs.

Dictatorship like in China can be efficient to send corrupt people for harming the functioning of society to fast capital punishment. China ignored Nobel Peace Prize but honestly speaking Alfred Nobel got all that money and wealth developing dynamite helping governments wage wars and there is nothing noble behind such prizes. Dirty money cannot make noble prizes! Putting price in science is bad also since nature does not endorse the economic profitability as many good things to humans may not be that good for money making.

I believe that China would give capital punishment instead of bonuses for the perpetrators of this worldwide economic meltdown. If China wants to grow and stand it would not let science be so shamefully violated and ignored like Americans are doing letting bad apples spoils fairness in society.

There is an ongoing struggle between power and knowledge on human affairs and a simple logic implies that wise people are so knowledgeable and independent becoming unfit to any distorted chain of power.

Mr. Obama, my former Embrapa boss Dr. Evaristo Eduardo de Miranda took me for a walk and threatened my family and took my honest job away as this is common around here as government gives job to people that cannot deliver. That day I looked deeply into his eyes and I said that the best protection to my family was just my HONESTY and that there was no other way to make them safer. Now you are aware that your biased government is shamefully violating the IP rights of my ‘scientific discovery’ regarding new conceptions of advanced Hydrogeology in the patenting affairs. Even worse, it is crushing a CLASSIC SCIENCE HYDROLOGY important to the functioning of society.

Instead of bothering with cursing drunken teens why don’t you send the FBI to dismantle this abhorrent and disgusting violation of science in the patenting system pressing charges, putting people in jail and giving a message to society that you are in control protecting values and the due functioning of society and the LAW.

My ‘scientific discovery’ will stand any distortion, but your job may fall short if your miss your duties.

Mr. Obama you will have to swallow that the aggravation of the Macondo Oil Field at the Golf of Mexico making it the worst oil spill in the American history was indeed negligence on your duties failing to protect Hydrology. This can be easily tested!

Perhaps you are fighting the wrong terrorists that endanger safety of the United States of America!

It seems that the actual threatening to American security is just dishonesty and incompetence.

Nature blesses the United States of America.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, November 11, 2010

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265

Email: el_silva@uol.com.br

(http://hydrotechnology.blogspot.com/)

c.c.

Douglas G. Gallagher, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, Mcnett & Henry LLP

Michael D. Young , Irio Calasso, Patrick Griss, Emad Sarofim, Rainer Jaeggi, Uwe Kraemer, Dave Hasker, Volker Zimmer, Wilfried Schmid, Otto Fuerst, Hans List, Hans-Peter Haar, Theo Arnitz, Steven N. Roe, Roche Diagnostics Operations Inc.

Robert L. Stoll - Director of the USPTO

Dilma Roussef – Brazilian Elected President

Thomas Shannon, U.S. Ambassador to Brazil

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Fourteenth Letter to Mr. Obama on June 23, 2010

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Obama,

The Consequences of Cheating Hydrology

Mr. Obama, just imagine your reputation when story down the line proves that the oil spill could have been stopped in few hours if Hydrology Science had been respected. It will be hard to American conscience that this environmental damage came from a cozy association between US government institutions and wealth corporations overstepping the boundaries of honesty.

USPTO is running a cheating Patenting System harming technological innovation. I am a PhD scientist and if I apply the same article to different journals it is considered a dishonest and blatant cheating. If I change the title and apply again the same ideas it becomes a shameful unethical in science. Also, in science we use strong technological words to grab the core of our expression while in the patenting system an obscure wording and distorted multiple filings is employed to circumvent what is already granted.

Under your failing leadership USPTO continues supporting a flawed patenting system that endorses any invention be reinvented letting wealth corporations to evade intellectual property rights claiming invented ideas cheating on science and marrying technological development like is happening now to Hydrology so required on deep oil drilling industry that bears environmental risks hard to control.

Why is the soap bubble rounded?


Just because it is the most efficient geometry for the distribution of forces in nature which is so coherent on the principles.

- Just imagine if eggs were made squared like details 12 and 15 of Fig. 2 US Pat. 7,740,669!

Lay people working with fluidic devices as inventors, attorneys, and examiners are not aware on such insights from nature while this is so common in biological sciences and Hydrology.

Samsung is circumventing my ‘scientific breakthrough’ with a poor patent that clearly ignores the existence of a science called Hydrology and the IP rights over my patent US6,766,817. USPTO already confirmed having no Hydrologist as a Patent Examiner. My patent was referred but and it seem that the Examiner Alexa D. Neckel seems to be a Chemical Engineer missing Hydrogeology background.

Patent Violation: The squared details 12 and 15 in the Fig. 2 of US 7,749,669 becomes a constriction channel like showed in the shadowed region in the same feature of my patent filed four years earlier and explained deeply bearing a strong Hydrogeological background accordingly reported in the scientific literature.

So far USPTO allowed 16,316 patents on ‘fuel cells’ and it seems that none of them addressed Hydrologyaccordingly to the present scientific literature showing that US 7,749,669 is one more within a technological gap to be tackled.

Biological porosity on their physiological functioning employs no squared geometry. if Samsung wants product reliability it will have to comply to an advanced hydrodynamic functioning so plenty on text books.

I developed ‘Tubarc’ as a tube in arc contention to enhance capillarity giving a continuous lateral flow in the cylindrical geometry. To prevent cheaters like Samsung I stated that this geometry on less efficient functioning could assume straight lines. I am curious how much those inventors and examiners behind US 7,749,669 understand the functioning of phloem and xylem and Hydrogeology. It seems that they are just lay people working in a field they have no expertise taking advantage of American government failing leadership that sometimes can lead to catastrophes like Mexican Gulf oil spill when Ethics and honesty are compromised.

When fluids move as Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow the molecules are connected to each other and to the porosity surface making the rounded geometry critical to the hydrodynamic functioning as deeply explained at my issued pat. US 6,766,817.

Samsung is aware that at any time till 2024 when my patent rights expire I can bring the subject to the Court of the Law and claim IP rights having experts to provide their scientific opinion just because Science is above the Law.

Since 2006 in written communication I have been demanding USPTO to stop a massive infringement on my issued patent rights suggesting the following below to USPTO:

1. Hire Examiners with background inHydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;

2. Cancel issued patents withscientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;

3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.

4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.

5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).

6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).

7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

Mr. President, the oil spilling is a Hydrological issue and your reputation will be associated to your negligence toward a classical science called HYDROLOGY being restrained on its technological advancement regarding the patenting affairs.

The consequences of the oil spill are already a good evidence of the problems that society is facing when honesty is ignored curbing technological development. Clogging a well from spilling oil using simple Hydrodynamic conceptions of transport and deposition of particles is an important technological edge to develop making deep oil drilling safer to the environment. There are many reasons to bring Hydrology science to advanced level in order to foster many technological frontiers.

Furthermore, there is no doubt that down the line deep water drilling industry requires advanced Hydrology for performance and safety. When knowledge is suppressed critical problems are not addressed accordingly on the core. It seems that there is no assurance that injection of mud from the relief well will stop the leaking. Perhaps Soil Science conceptions of Erosion will be needed unless you want to keep the well spilling for a long unpredictable period.

‘For the record mud is a composition of clay that would clog tiny pores but fails on rock fissures.’

There is no assurance that relief wells will halt the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and perhaps you will have to count on widely known hydrodynamic conceptions from Soil Erosion and Conservation on detachment, transport, and deposition of sediments to clog the well nearly what happened in the Dust Bowl a while ago.

For the sake of deep drilling oil industry outcome there is a need to develop well clogging approach by using counter flow deposition employing hydrodynamics conceptions from Soil Science. I believe a well could be clogged in few hours just by employing an appropriate method as the flow is upward against gravity that pulls down.

For a while I do not need to go to The Court of the Law to protect my ‘scientific discovery’ because nature is rewarding your blatant arrogance, dishonesty, and disregard of science. I have no doubt that SCIENCE is above the LAW as you reap what you sow.

Nature blesses the United States of America rewarding what is deserved.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, June 23, 2010

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265

Email: el_silva@uol.com.br

(http://hydrotechnology.blogspot.com/)

c.c.

D. Bruce Prout - Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP

Law Dept. - Samsung SDI CO., LTD.

Robert L. Stoll - Director of the USPTO

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – Brazilian President

José Sergio Gabrielli de Azevedo - Petrobras President

Thomas Shannon, U.S. Ambassador to Brazil

Monday, June 7, 2010

Thirteenth Letter to Mr. Obama on June 7, 2010

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Obama,

Ignoring Hydrology and Oil Spill in the Mexican Gulf

Hydrology has been ignored for a century in the Patenting Affairs curbing a technological development that seems to be a keystone on hydrodynamic functioning to stop the oil leaking. This is my 13th letter sent to you getting no reply so far.

When I say that my first pat. US 6,766,817 issued in 2004 cancels around 50,000 patents and open room for another 200,000 new ones is because principles of Classical Hydrology has been ignored on fluidic devices in the patenting system for a century. Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow (wick/wicking) was coined in the scientific literature in 1906 by Edgard Buckingham to address flow above the water table updating Darcy’s Law proposed in 1853 on Hydraulic Conductivity.

Clogging the well: Detachment, transport, and deposition of particles in the mass flow dynamics were totally ignored. Instead of using mud, gulf ball, and shredded tires BP was supposed to use high density particles capable of going down the well lumen by gravity against a bubbling upward flow of 1.2 cm/s. A simple prototype trial would provide the predicted performance of sand, coarse sand, pebbles, marbles, bolts, nails, etc. Cylindrical format would enhance density reducing the dragging effect of upward flow against gravity. Nail like format gives pointed lower surface and head for efficient upright descending.

Sucking the Oil: BP made a simple mistake of ignoring that a fluid column o a mile upward becomes excessively heavy to provide enough suction power down to grab all the leaking oil. The fundamentals of Molecular Connectivity is in one of my patent applications dealing with the transfer of energy between rotating energy and inertial energy by no partitioning mass flow. Now in case clogging the well fails a potential fast and efficient solution to suck the leaking oil is to send the pumps down near the leaking to develop a stronger sucking power and push the fluid mass upward. Sucking power of pumping for a mile down due to partitioning of mass flow dynamics is highly restrictive by molecular connectivity on traction.

Since 2006 in written communication I have been demanding USPTO to stop a massive infringement on my issued patent rights suggesting the following below to USPTO:

1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;

2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;

3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.

4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.

5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).

6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).

7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

Indeed it will be harmful to your reputation if the oil keeps leaking till August as you continue ignoring Hydrology Science insights which could have provided easy solutions to curb it in the very early beginning causing huge economic and environmental damage.

Furthermore, there is no doubt that down the line deep water drilling industry requires advanced Hydrology for performance and safety. When knowledge is suppressed critical problems are not addressed accordingly on the core.

Nature blesses you and the United States of America getting the consequences for ignoring Hydrology.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, June 07, 2010

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265

Email: el_silva@uol.com.br

(http://hydrotechnology.blogspot.com/)

Twelfth Letter to Mr. Obama on May 30, 2010

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Obama,

Stopping the Oil Spill

The oil spill could be halted in few hours or days if the appropriate approach is employed adequately using common knowledge plenty on scientific literature.

The ‘top kill’ operation just failed because instead of mud, gulf balls, and tires, BP was supposed to use sand, coarse sand, pebbles, marbles, bolts, nails, etc.

Go to any river shore throwing mud, gulf balls, and a marble to see how the rapids respond to the transportation and deposition of such things. A river is diverted with rocks and heavy bodies capable of standing the erosive forces of flowing masses. This is a basic knowledge at my PhD at Soil Erosion and Conservation on the dynamics of detachment, transportation, and deposition of soil aggregate on runoff. I learned it deeply on my PhD at Penn State University and even I have some ongoing patents associated to such forces on filtering system allowing self-cleaning features.

The well 22 inches spewing about 15,000 barrels a day is carryon an upward flow at the average speed of about 1.2 cm/s certainly having higher speed in the center and lower speed in the border due to dragging effect of a still containment barrier. Heavy particles and specific format objects can percolate easily through the well lumen slowly reducing the speed and allowing smaller and smaller particles till it clog completely. The well 4.5 km deep can be easily clogged by an appropriate approach from Soil Erosion insights dealing with detachment, transport, and deposition of sediments.

Why BP is not doing it?

Just because BP has no PhD in Soil Science in their team to handle the dynamic mass flow complexity, just Geologists.

Mr. Obama, it is so simple to run some trials and gauge the best sediments and objects to percolate downward against an upward flow velocity of 1.2 cm/s and start injecting the appropriate material to clog and halt the oil spill. Also, it is easy to gauge the upward velocity variation from the center outward to the boundaries.

My suggestion to you is just to resign for continuous failing on your leadership. This is my 12th letter demanding respect to science and put appropriate personnel at USPTO to honor my patents that are constantly violated. It is not a surprise if Officials at USPTO are also watching pornography instead of doing their duties. USPTO is running in the same fashion as Mineral Management Service with a deeply malfunctioning patenting system that allows multiple filing using a distorted approach to allow rich parties to reinvent what is already invented disrespecting science, common knowledge and issued patents. Also there is a cozy association between USPTO and huge corporations on patenting affairs.

Shamefully my ‘scientific discovery’ was violated again last week since USPTO is allowing any invention being reinvented as many times as money comes in mainly on Hydrology affairs. You do not care about SCIENCE.

I am not surprised if this letter is ignored again letting my science be violated with the consequences of failing leadership. The consequences come as the oil is gushing from the seabed and teaching Americans about the importance of respecting NATURE and SCIENCE and the importance of HONESTY. Let’s the oil spill and my IP rights be dishonored. Who cares?

Nature blesses you and the United States of America teaching on the balance of nature and honesty.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, May 30, 2010

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265

Email: el_silva@uol.com.br

(http://hydrotechnology.blogspot.com/)