Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Ninth Letter to Mr. Obama on December 8, 2009

Mr. Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Obama,

Breaking the Law, Breaching of Ethics and Violation of Science

Mr. President only 47% of Americans are supporting your leadership according to recent polls showing a continuous failure and negligence about the public system as this becomes my ninth letter sent to you having no single reply regarding a bias against Hydrology by USPTO and other American institutions.

Today USPTO issued the patent US 7,628,942 which certainly cannot be a violation to my issued patent US 6,766,817 but also to nobody else since it bears a clear scientific flaw in hydrology that invalidates all its claims. This patent address hydrology by the lay expression wicking flow when it is neither wicking nor unsaturated flow but a phenomenon called Vertically Upwards Seepage in Hydrogeology.

US 7,628,942 ‘Resin infiltration transfer technique’ by Miller; David V. (Pittsburgh, PA), Baranwal; Rita (Glenshaw, PA), assigned to The United States of America as represented by the United States Department of Energy (Washington, DC).

I got my PhD in Soil Science/Spatial Applied Hydrology at the Penn State University and by chance Bill Clinton was there on my commencement on May 10, 1996 releasing his first speech from reelection. He said that we should be proud of receiving the highest education that the United States of America could offer their citizens.

Bill Clinton said that we were going to expand the technological frontiers far beyond that present situation providing new jobs on new fields still to be created. He missed about ongoing bias by USPTO neglecting Hydrology and government institutions breaking the Law, breaching Ethics and violating Science.

I bumped to a sort of ‘scientific discovery dealing with Classical Hydrology being neglected near a century by the patenting system on fluidic devices since the USPTO database is showing that inventors, attorneys, and even examiners are just lay people not trained in Hydrology Science simply ignoring long standing conceptions of fluids moving on porosity.

Easily I figured out that Hydrology in the patenting system is handled by laypeople tracking down conductivity assessment. Today around 71,672 patents mention Heat/Thermal Conductivity, about 52,114 on Electric/Electrical Conductivity, and only 496 on Hydraulic Conductivity. Wick/wicking which is not in the Hydrology scientific terminology is mentioned in around 24,891 issued patents. The phenomenon of wick/wicking is called Unsaturated Hydraulic conductivity and is mentioned today in just 20 issued patents.

My first patent US 6,766,817 was easily issued on Jul 25, 2004 but afterwards it was ignored massively showing that USPTO has no Hydrologists in the examination process. My partners Patent Attorneys suggested me to request IDS (Information Disclosure Statement) so that the examiners would be required to consider my new conceptions in Hydrodynamics bearing a strong scientific background from my PhD Hydrology books.

From this continuous raping of Hydrology I believe even more that my ‘scientific discovery’ (US 6,766,817) as a breakthrough making near 50 thousand patents obsolete for ignoring Hydrology and opening rooms for another new 200 thousand patents combining Hydrology and Energy Cycle on mass transfer. Since 2006 in written communication I have been demanding USPTO to stop a massive infringement on my issued patent rights suggesting the following below to USPTO:

1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;

2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;

3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.

4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.

5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).

6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).

7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

I believe that it does not require a strong intellectual acumen to notice that Hydrology is supposed to be handled by Hydrologists, as well as Laws are handled by Lawyers, Chemistry by Chemists, and so on.

By the way, Hydrology is not a new science. Henry Darcy proposed a Law about Saturated Flow in 1856 to address Hydraulic Conductivity on porosity. Edgard Buckingham proposed an updating equation to measure Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow in 1907 and my issued patent US 6,766,817 is the first one to measure it on artificial porosity near a century later deploying classical hydrogeology to the patenting system.

By the way, wick/wicking is the kite of aerodynamics marring today 24,891 issued patents by skirting common knowledge in classical Hydrology showing how long a Classical Science can be ignored.

There is plenty of coherence to create a new science I called ‘Hydrotechnology’ to address this huge technological and scientific gap bringing Hydrogeology principles to artificial porosity exploring molecular connectivity on mass flow dynamics.

The Commissioner of Patents is suggesting that I challenge at the Court of Law violations of my patents that I disagree. I told him that it may be more appropriate to challenge USPTO on Dereliction of Duty and Breaching of Ethics. Many violating patents have scientific flaws from lay people that do not have the appropriate expertise to address the subject and is taking advantage of USPTO negligence on Hydrological Examination allowing non Hydrologists break Ethics on a field they are not known in the art – HYDROLOGY. When filing patents at USPTO I was expecting Hydrology be examined by Hydrologists and my patent rights be respected accordingly.

Honesty and commonality are the best analytical tools to make inroads to nature secrets. Some lay inventors propelled by ignorance think that flying a kite can lead them toward airplanes by skirting aerodynamics.

Nature blesses you and the United States of America and let Hydrology ring free from lay people.

Kind regards,

Campinas, Brazil, December 8, 2009

Elson Silva, Ph. D.

Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265






No comments:

Post a Comment